VIDEO: Nixon and Hulshof on Nuclear Plant
Wednesday, September 17th, 2008
Daily Political News from St. Louis
Currently:
Antonio is going to bed.
I'm appalled that Missouri denies Food Stamps to people convicted of drug felonies. Like starvation is the road to rehabilitation. Insanity
Antonio might upload some photos tonight.
BREAKING NEWS: Sen. Kit Bond won't seek re-election in 2010?
Working out. Waiting for Obama's speech on the economy @ 10:00.
Antonio has opened the comment line. PubDef.net has an open thread. Speak your mind!
Loading ...
5 Comments
No Nukes in MO!
Wednesday, 17th September 2008 at 9:14 AM
Nuclear power is very risky. In the short-term it may help supply needed energy. But are we willing to bet that there will be no major mistakes over the next 50 years? Because the consequences will last for centuries.
Calvin
Wednesday, 17th September 2008 at 9:23 AM
“It’s not as simple as favor or oppose”? Huh, Jay? Grow a pair.
No Way Jay!
Wednesday, 17th September 2008 at 10:15 AM
Jay Nixon stinks. He is the worst kind of politician. He’ll say anything and say nothing at all, all at the same time.
Karen G.
Wednesday, 17th September 2008 at 2:08 PM
Nuclear and coal? Seriously? Is that all we can think of to address our energy needs? Where are the NEW ideas and NEW technologies? We need elected officials brave enough to think outside of the box.
Ben
Saturday, 20th September 2008 at 9:51 PM
Nuclear power is not sustainable, nor is it even economically viable. The costs of transportation and storage (for millennia!) of the waste produced far outweigh any short-term benefits of this so-called “free” energy, not to mention the environmental risks. From a long term perspective, it would likely be more cost-effective to simply dam the Mississippi nd build the world’s biggest hydro-electric plant than build more nuke plants.
Leave a Comment