ABOUT THE WATCH

"The St. Louis Schools Watch was founded on the premises that parental and community involvement are needed for good schools to flourish, and that public participation is a cornerstone of democracy. The Watch offers information and analysis that we hope contributes to a public debate over what changes are necessary to improve St. Louis public schools, and what works."

-- Peter Downs, Founder


Got a press release, news tip or rumor to share? Maybe a suggestion on how we can improve this site? Email us at editor@pubdef.net

Or call our 24-hour Tip Line at (314) 518-2364. All tips are confidential.



 

 

 

 

Move and Repair

By Antonio D. French

Filed Friday, June 2 at 11:07 AM

A letter from Peter Downs, school board member and founder of The St. Louis Schools Watch:

As one of the seven school board members, who must vote on the disposition of the ROTC program currently at Cleveland High School, many, many people have asked me what my opinion on the proposed moves of the Junior ROTC and Classical Junior Academy programs from Cleveland and McKinley Schools.

I think we should move the students out of Cleveland while we work on a plan with community representatives to repair and reopen Cleveland as a high school.

Some people may argue that since the old school board refused to work with north side communities when it closed 16 schools three years ago, this board should not work with south side communities now. I opposed the board's action three years ago. I do not believe that wrong doing by school board members three years ago in any way sets a precedent that I must follow today.

I have seen nothing, either in Superintendent Williams' presentation or in the tour of damage that Cleveland's principal gave me, that indicates there is any structural damage to facility, although I did see a lot of cosmetic damage.



I think the history and architectural significance of the building have value. During the public hearing, I heard representatives from different parts of the community express their willingness to work to both determine a repair plan and raise money to help carry it out.

I think the school board should explore the offers of help from the community for repairing and reopening the school. The potential for private help to preserve and update the existing facility could make that course much cheaper for the school district than the alternative that Williams put forward, that of tearing down the facility and building new.

As for McKinley, I think it makes no sense to mess with a successful program that regularly ranks among the top ten in the state. I think the Classical Junior Academy should stay where it is and the school district should look elsewhere for a temporary home for the ROTC program that is currently at Cleveland.

I am not speaking here for anyone else. These opinions are the personal opinions of just one of the seven school board members.


2 Comments:

travis_reems said...

It is wonderful to see that the castle and the community both have the support of at least one member of the school board. I hope that we can win the hearts and minds of the other members over time.

The Alliance to Save Cleveland High School has posted on their site fliers for the community (http://www.saveclevelandhigh.org/4.html), as well as the press release for the Monday press conference (http://www.saveclevelandhigh.org/2.html).

Sunday, June 04, 2006 12:32:44 AM

 
Anonymous said...

If slps couldn't afford to maintain the building to start with how can they afford to tear down, rebuild and maintain a new building? I have been in the building business too long to buy into the opinion that a newer building is cheaper to maintain. The boilers and battleship linoleum paid for itself almost 100 years ago. The structure of the building is good. The biggest problems are are due to the envelope. They need to quit playing money games their proprietary roofing contractor and get the building water tight.(look Tremco up on the web)http://www.sfweekly.com/Issues/2003-02-26/news/feature_full.html Good maintenance practices dictate an occasional paint job anyway. So get the building watertight, patch some plaster and you are already at a good starting point. Slps couldn't wait to downsize and eliminate their own maintenance department. Question---How many roofers does SLPS employ to maintain approx 10 million square feet of school buildings? Answer---None!!!!! What's wrong with this picture?????????????????????????
Keep up the good work Peter.

Monday, June 05, 2006 3:22:33 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Help us with the cost of operating this site:




Advertise on Pub Def



Advertise on Pub Def