ABOUT THE WATCH

"The St. Louis Schools Watch was founded on the premises that parental and community involvement are needed for good schools to flourish, and that public participation is a cornerstone of democracy. The Watch offers information and analysis that we hope contributes to a public debate over what changes are necessary to improve St. Louis public schools, and what works."

-- Peter Downs, Founder


Got a press release, news tip or rumor to share? Maybe a suggestion on how we can improve this site? Email us at editor@pubdef.net

Or call our 24-hour Tip Line at (314) 518-2364. All tips are confidential.



 

 

 

 

Who's Writing the Checks?

By Antonio D. French

Filed Tuesday, June 27 at 8:14 AM

In the three week since St. Louis Public School's treasurer abruptly resigned, Superintendent Creg Williams still has not asked the school board to approve a new one. In the meantime, without a vote of the board, the district's interim chief financial officer, Cedric Lewis, has also been serving as the acting treasurer.

Nearly three weeks ago, Enos Moss suddenly resigned as treasurer of the St. Louis Public Schools. Although the district has repeatedly declined to comment, some people believe that his quick departure was related to a $4.2 million bill from the district's Pension Board.

That bill was delivered to the district in December 2005, but did not come to the attention of the Williams or Lewis until six months later. And since it was not included in this year's budget drafts, next year's projected budget deficit literally doubled overnight.

That Williams has not asked for board approval of Moss' replacement is a source of controversy in the district and on the school board. Board President Veronica O'Brien told PUB DEF that Williams was asked to present a resolution to the board for approval, which he has not done yet.

Board approval for personnel reassignments is something that is clearly spelled out in Williams' contract, which was obtained by PUB DEF last week after a Sunshine Law request.

"It was my understanding that the board should approve this change," said O'Brien. She said that is especially needed for a position as sensitive as treasurer, whose name appears on all of the district's checks.

District spokesperson Tony Sanders could not tell us whose name is currently on district checks.

Bill Purdy, vice-president of the school board, said he was "disappointed that the superintendent has chosen to challenge the board's authority." He said Williams could have called a special meeting to at least inform the board of his selection.

"The superintendent would be wise to recognize that board members are elected by the vote of citizens," said Purdy. "It is that same board that hires and evaluates the performance of the superintendent."

"Superintendents are directly accountable to the board of education and not the other way around," he said.

Related Stories:

$2 million mix-up?
VIDEO: CFO says deficit has doubled


28 Comments:

Brian Harris said...

Ive had enough, I dont wish to hear another bad thing about SLPS! They are a mess, and I just cant take anymore, Someone shut the system down, fire everyone and start over.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:56:59 PM

 
travis_reems said...

Cedric Lewis has been interviewed for the position. So, it must be assumed that they are looking for a replacement.

Brian, your statements are a little drastic. The district is in dire straits, but can be fixed. We are on the right track. Just look at the recent Board elections. We just need to keep up the momentum with the coming elections.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:58:58 PM

 
Antonio D. French said...

Travis, I think people are looking to the superintendent on just how it can be fixed. To date, he hasn't offered much.

The "strategic plan" that is so often touted by Williams and his cheerleaders is really more of a strategic wish list. He has not told the public or the board how he plans to pay for many of his suggestions.

But much more importantly, he has not presented any suggestions at all on how to deal with what he has repeatedly described as a looming "financial crisis."

Williams has said that the district will have no way of paying its bills in less than 18 months, but then presented a budget that not only does not help the situation, but adds nearly $4 million to the debt.

For those of us that pay attention to the actions and not just the rhetoric, serious doubts are emerging about Williams' preparedness to lead this district out of financial and academic crisis.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 11:46:48 PM

 
past employee said...

antonio said it best...how are we going to pay for all these ideas???

no matter what it is in life that you want, somebody somewhere somehow has to pay. Wish all you want, you can only get what you can pay for.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:31:08 AM

 
travis_reems said...

Antonio:

I agree, it was irresponsible of the administration to submit a budget with a $2 million budget deficit. Keep in mind that $2 million of that $4 million was sprung on the Superintendent at the last minute. He should have known about that outstanding bill, but didn't have that oversight in place.

I applaud the Board of Education for not accepting it, but they should have gone a step further by compelling the Superintendent and his staff to return to the next regularly scheduled Board meeting with a new, balanced budget. The system is messed-up enough to spread the blame around.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:08:34 AM

 
Antonio D. French said...

Travis, whether or not the superintendent knew the amount of the Pension Fund bill, it is his responsibility to expect that bill. It wasn't even included in the budget drafts.

And I think the message was conveyed to Williams that the board expects a balanced budget to be submitted as soon as possible. The board even passed a resolution directing the superintendent to look at administrative costs as a source for cuts.

Without characterizing the actions of individual board members, I can say that what I'm doing is not placing blame, but rather holding one of the highest paid public employees in the state to a high level of accountability for his actions.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:21:17 AM

 
Brian Harris said...

You know the superintendent is not fully to blame even though he is most responsible when the ball falls, but his staff is not, lets say, the best staff workers and keep getting him in trouble, you cant watch everygthing thats happening you know, thats the reason you hire people to do a job and if they are screwing up then you look bad, not them! Its not all his fault for the district so yelling at him and blaming him and even firing him wont solve the problem! The real problem with the district is the ability to do a crap job and not be fired! most people in the district, if they loose their current jobs they have friends who can just place them to "teach our kids" and then the kids suffer. Its hard to fire someone in the district on any level that would leave them jobless, but if that were possible I think people wouldnt be so careless and relaxed when it comes to matters as this one, a two million dollar mess up, how in the hell do you miss two million dollars in a budget? Its the idoit in financings fault, I went to a board meeting and heard him speak about the budget, I would have like to have taken his job, the fool was talking about borrowing money to pay reocurring bills, is he stupid. I could go on and on about the districts financial problem, the only thing is that the state would help them pay that mess off, or else they are screwed!

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:55:33 AM

 
Antonio D. French said...

Brian, when you say "the idiot in financings fault," are speaking of Cedric Lewis, the district's interim chief financial officer?

I would hardly call Mr. Lewis an idiot. We seems to me a very intelligent and competent man. But if you are dissatified with his performance, you should keep in mind that Dr. Williams has kept him on as CFO and has even added to his list of responsibilities by making him acting treasurer as well.

I find it hard to believe that you can call one person an idiot and then let the person that hired them completely off the hook.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:16:56 AM

 
travis_reems said...

Antonio:

I am agreeing with you. The administration needs to be held accountable for its actions and decisions, as does the School Board. I think the Board could have been a bit more directive to the Superintendent regarding the budget, beyond an analysis of the central administration budget.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:24:06 AM

 
snoopydad24 said...

To Antonio, Travis, and Brian,

If you haven’t figured out by now this district doesn’t get rid of people for not doing their jobs. Many are hired because they are a relative, spouse, friend, and even an affair gone bad (they are hired to keep their mouths shut). It is hard to fire these people or even tell them they need to step up to get the job done. Some people are put into positions because they know of a skeleton or two about the person doing the hiring. Others simply want the job for the title. They have no intention of doing anything but they have a title (I know an Athletic Director who fits this). Then there is the Union which I will leave for some other time. I will let you guys figure out who should be replaced and who should be transferred to a different job (which they may be better qualified for), or asked to seek other employment.

As far as the finances go it is not uncommon in this district taking six or more months to pay a bill. It was no surprise to me that this $2 million dollar bill for retirement showed up six months after the fact. To add more salt to the wound many vendors in the area and some national suppliers are on a cash only basis with the St. Louis Public Schools. It makes it very hard for me to get supplies until the vendor gets their money. Even when I get supplies it takes up to six months to get reimburse if I reimburse at all. I even had students presented with letters to receive savings bonds but didn’t receive them until six months after the presentation. In your home and/or business it doesn’t take this long to pay your bills. Otherwise what happens?

As I have said in other blogs under anonymous until the district start holding its employees accountable for their jobs these problems will continue to arise. A job is more than title. And all jobs are temporary. It is up to the employee as to how well he/she works at their job will determine the length of the job. This is for most jobs there are always exceptions.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 12:40:20 PM

 
Brian Harris said...

Antonio, The superintendent didnt hire a finance guy that he felt was an idiot, people put up fronts to the big boss but behind close doors they act like someone else, it just appears that is the case here, Like you said mr. lewis has a good record, but how in hell did he make the mistakes??? or were they really mistakes or getting laxed on the job. Look, there are a million things on earth to grip about, and another ten million to blame for it, BUT A HUMAN BEING IS NOT GOD!!!
PEOPLE MAKE BAD DECISIONS AND MISTAKES, and they think there right with their ideas and stuff, so aslong as we live there will be many problems and mess, I almost never hear suggestions on how to fix the problems! I hear gripes about what a person would do. Hell, if anyone of you people on here have been in a leadership position over people you know how it is when you see a vision for something and when the people see another vision for the samething and then nothing gets done and in the end its all your fault!!! ITS JUST LIFE!

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:30:55 PM

 
snoopydad24 said...

So, Mr. Harris your assignment if you choose to accept it is to come up with ten recommendations on how to make the finance department better. Be sure to include speed up the bill paying process. Next come up with ten new suggestions to balance the budget while maintaining the level of education that is required by the state and No Child Left Behind. Also do not forget about money for maintaining old and new buildings and maintenance of grounds (i.e. mowing grass). This will be due tomorrow.

Being a good leader also means making tough decisions. When someone messes up yes people will come to you for answers. At the same time you will get the credit when people under you do a good job. What you do with these people and how you handle mistakes and successes determines what kind of leader you are. Being a volunteer for a wide variety of civic events I have had to make these kinds of decisions and tell volunteers to seek a different committee or I do not ask them to help again. And there has been one time I had to have the police escort a volunteer away from an event. That one was tough. Yes people do make mistakes but how will you correct the situation from hopefully not happening again? Will you work with the person or just tell them to seek new employment.

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:39:32 PM

 
Brian Harris said...

Snoopdogg, I personally believe that slps should close alot more of there buildings, Slps is a client of mine and Ive been through alot of schools, most of which need to be closed. But when you try to close them black folks make it seem like the kids will be crammed into classrooms and school overcrowding, when I can tell you thats not the case at all, most schools are half empty. Also I would fire most of the district and work with the few left, I know this sound extreme but if you could see the full scope of the problem and really wanted a change then you would have to do something like this AND slps has tried to hint to this a few times i believe when they brough in robertti, he wasnt from around here and that made it easier for him to make the tough desicions "that needed to be made" because he has no connections here. If you know the district well most people are related or they are good friends, its too connect like that and anyone from this city will face some music if they were to try to do the right thing, it may even endanger there families. And thats why you see the district trying to bring in these people from out of the area because they dont have those connections to fear. But I aint no punk, I'd fire people who aint worth shxt to the district, Im not saying all teachers are like that but plenty are, they need to be out of their, Just take your pick and stop by any high or middle school on the northside and let me know how you feel about your kids being in their! Look, Im going to make it simple, the stock market gets talked about, they say the market is down, its not worth investing into right now, but the market is just a "reflection" of societys economy! the super intendent can take all the crap but the school district is just a reflection of the people in it, who work for it. So "to me" If anyone who works for the board wants to make some changes they need to start with themselves! Im not siding with the district, Im just real and speak the truth. The super intendent has blame to take but if you really want to solve the problem you have to see that 1. its bigger than him and 2. he really doesnt have the power to make the nessary changes, so the people working within the district need to be held just as accountable as him!

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:40:40 PM

 
Anonymous said...

This was originally posted on the Pub Def Weekly web site.

Anonymous said...
Veronica O'Brien is the Mobb Boss of the Saint Louis Public Schools. Whoever is trying to do anything in the Saint Louis Public Schools had better kiss her ring. She has shown that she runs the School Board and the day to day functions of the Saint Louis Public Schools. We needed a Mobb Boss for the Saint Louis Public Schools, but I didn't think it would end up being a lady. Some say it is better to be feared than loved, and Veronica O'Brien is definitely feared.

Maybe the Saint Louis teachers union should join forces with her, most unions connect with a Mobb Boss!

6/27/2006 8:58 PM

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:56:04 PM

 
Anonymous said...

Wow! What an exchange of words. Mr. Harris your last response sounds like you much rather have the buildings instead of the school. Are you commenting for the students or the closure of the schools so you can sell them? Whose side are you really on?

Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:47:05 AM

 
Brian Harris said...

Close the dam schools! I dont want to buy them, but the district might want to sell them to pay some bills, LOL. They dont need all the schools they have, most buildings are not even half full! this is a waste of money spent on staff, eletric, gas, water and food. It would be wise to close the schools, this will not affect the ablity of the students to learn, I always had 25-30 kids in my classrooms growing up and I went to inner city schools, I turned out ok, but hell, when you have 8 kids in a class and two teachers and the kids still aint learning, "do you really believe it has something to do with class size?" Of course not, the reason people dont want buildings closed is because of two things, teachers and staff trying to keep jobs and the attachment people have to buildings, like the memories that were created their, but that doesnt mean that closing the building is not the right thing to do for the district sake! Do you really want to help the kids at the end of the day or do you want to help the kids as long as your feelings dont get hurt by, lets say, your favorite building being closed?

Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:59:52 AM

 
past employee said...

Brian Harris is right. If you screw up enough and the heat is on they will take you out of human resources and make you a teacher. Then the children suffer because their thought process is guided by an inadequate fool who has strong opinions who directed the hiring of "friends and relatives" and couldn't hold a real job without outside help. I guess nepotism wouldn't be so bad if they had some SMART friends or relatives who were employable somewhere other than SLPS. No I wasn't fired.....I quit!

Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:43:20 PM

 
Brian Harris said...

your right on past emp.

Friday, June 30, 2006 1:30:45 AM

 
Anonymous said...

I do not know who is writing the checks. Consider known of the teachers in St. Louis Public Schools got paid today. What's up with that?

Friday, June 30, 2006 8:21:45 AM

 
Anonymous said...

none...sorry

Friday, June 30, 2006 8:22:56 AM

 
Anonymous said...

Speaking of neoptism and cronyism, Mike McMillan's mom got a plush job through such connections. Wonder what Slay thinks of that? Instead of running for license collector, maybe he would be a shoo in for treasurer for the school district.

Friday, June 30, 2006 6:37:17 PM

 
travis_reems said...

Cedric Lewis, interim CFO for the District, has called for as much as what Brian is. Mr. Lewis calls it right-sizing to adjust from the roughly 90 schools in the District that serve the roughly 60,000 students. He models two other school districts where he has worked for his justification of closing these schools. He cited that the Atlanta School District has about the same number of schools we do, but with about one and a half times as many students. Are more school closings in the future for our district?

Saturday, July 01, 2006 5:33:39 PM

 
Brian Harris said...

travis, there are about 45,000 students in the district, not 60,000. And about 5,000-8,000 are students that never showed up for school, they mostlikely when to county schools after signing up in the city. Check with a data processing office in the city schools and see for yourself.

Sunday, July 02, 2006 2:23:34 PM

 
Anonymous said...

Hell yes and my kids are two of them i signed up my kids for schools and have no $%#@ idea where they are going, i try to call the district and get the RUN AROUND! I'm fed up and my kids are going to county schools, I just know your not blaming anyone for this, parents should know in advance where their kids are going to attend. I know you won't miss us but good luck!

Sunday, July 02, 2006 10:00:17 PM

 
Philo-Teknos said...

Actually, there are only approximately 35,000 students left in the city school district.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:50:59 PM

 
Anonymous said...

Are these actual bodies or ghosts? I had ten students who showed up for maybe for a week (or a total of five days) this past school year.

Thursday, July 06, 2006 9:37:39 AM

 
Anonymous said...

Travis (I mean Peter Downs)

Cedric Lewis is the CFO; how do you have so much information? How do you know he interviewed. I haerd he had the job.

Please share with us!!!

Thursday, July 06, 2006 4:03:42 PM

 
Mr. Fat Nutts said...

Anony.... ASSHOLE, leave travis alone, he is not mr downs. also I believe your jonny little!

Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:34:31 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Help us with the cost of operating this site:




Advertise on Pub Def



Advertise on Pub Def